Fall '23 Scores & Standings
|
NY State Open Cup
ENY Challenge Cup
|
|
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9
Back of THE NET
|
OP
Back of THE NET
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 9 |
It seems like the Development Academies are the highest level of soccer now for the older age groups. What's the landscape for the best leagues/clubs below the DA? Is it the pre-DA programs like Red Bulls RDS?
It's quite confusing with NPL, EDP, NYCSL, WYSL, Premier, blah blah blah... not to mention all the marketing from the local clubs. Can someone break it down objectively?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
There is no "pre-academy" except as a marketing term. The only true Academy program is USDA run by USSF. So called pre-academy teams run by DA clubs really just offer the hope of making a full academy team some day. Some will have very good training and as long as you look at it like that - just good training with no expectations - then that's fine. RDS fits that bill - a few players may get pulled into DA from RB RDS but for the vast majority it's just training and at a price. It helps RB pay for their DA program. So called pre-academy teams run at non DA clubs are just using it to hook parents. It means nothing.
All the other leagues are just that, other leagues. They all have pros and cons and good and bad clubs within each. Try not to get caught up on leagues but focus on clubs near year you that have quality coaching, fit your $ and time budget. By the time its explained the landscape will change again. The fragmentation and constant change has gotten out of hand.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Pre-Academy should just mean teams at DA clubs at the ages younger than the DA programs begin (Boys U12, Girls U14).
They use that term to make you believe that by joining at U10 you will be "on track" to make the DA team. Make no mistake, when newer, shinier toys come to trial at the club they will choose them in a heartbeat over their "pre-academy" members.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Pre-Academy should just mean teams at DA clubs at the ages younger than the DA programs begin (Boys U12, Girls U14).
They use that term to make you believe that by joining at U10 you will be "on track" to make the DA team. Make no mistake, when newer, shinier toys come to trial at the club they will choose them in a heartbeat over their "pre-academy" members. Exactly - it's just marketing. It's no guarantee of anything, not even of good coaching. Always go for the best coaching no matter the club. If your kid is talented and works hard and wants DA then do it later on. Don't think they have to be at the "right club" when they're ten. There's incredible turnover between11-16. Many kids won't even be playing by HS.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Pre-Academy should just mean teams at DA clubs at the ages younger than the DA programs begin (Boys U12, Girls U14).
They use that term to make you believe that by joining at U10 you will be "on track" to make the DA team. Make no mistake, when newer, shinier toys come to trial at the club they will choose them in a heartbeat over their "pre-academy" members. Exactly - it's just marketing. It's no guarantee of anything, not even of good coaching. Always go for the best coaching no matter the club. If your kid is talented and works hard and wants DA then do it later on. Don't think they have to be at the "right club" when they're ten. There's incredible turnover between11-16. Many kids won't even be playing by HS. Agreed, but the problem is that usually you don't know who the coach is going to be when you are asked to commit to a club/team. And I have seen a lot of variance at most clubs - where excellent coaches work side by side with incompetent ones. Love to hear if anyone has any novel ideas on this issue or judging new (to you) clubs in general, other than "reputation" which tends to strongly favor the bigger/better known clubs.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
[quote=Anonymous]There's incredible turnover between11-16. Many kids won't even be playing by HS. Can you elaborate? What leads to the turnover?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Pre-Academy should just mean teams at DA clubs at the ages younger than the DA programs begin (Boys U12, Girls U14).
They use that term to make you believe that by joining at U10 you will be "on track" to make the DA team. Make no mistake, when newer, shinier toys come to trial at the club they will choose them in a heartbeat over their "pre-academy" members. Northeast has GDA at U13. I believe its just in a pilot mode
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
[quote=Anonymous]There's incredible turnover between11-16. Many kids won't even be playing by HS. Can you elaborate? What leads to the turnover? In no particular order - puberty (it isn't kind to everyone) - lose interest/want to play other sports or do other things - player flatline, especially if they don't work at it, while other accelerate and surpass - bigger players flatline if they've been relying on athleticism instead of skill Soccer is a big funnel. By U13-14 player start to see there's much more work and not as much fun. You have to want it and work at it to reach the upper levels. Some just don't have the skills, the drive, or both
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
[quote=Anonymous]There's incredible turnover between11-16. Many kids won't even be playing by HS. Can you elaborate? What leads to the turnover? In no particular order - puberty (it isn't kind to everyone) - lose interest/want to play other sports or do other things - player flatline, especially if they don't work at it, while other accelerate and surpass - bigger players flatline if they've been relying on athleticism instead of skill Soccer is a big funnel. By U13-14 player start to see there's much more work and not as much fun. You have to want it and work at it to reach the upper levels. Some just don't have the skills, the drive, or both Great response. Our coach at U13 had said only 25% of the U13 stars will be stars at U16 and he was about right. The good news is 75% of the U16 stars will remain on top by U18 so most of the changes are at the early puberty years.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Do you have any thoughts/advice on positions? Is it easier to stick if you're not trying to be the primary striker/goal scorer? How do you learn about what the other viable positions/archetypes are?
I feel like at the younger ages, it's really only about scoring goals.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
YOu learn by having a coach that doesnt pigeonhole you, even if your natural tendency is to score goals or distribute balls. Even great offensive players can benefit from a few stints at centerback or even goalie.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Do you have any thoughts/advice on positions? Is it easier to stick if you're not trying to be the primary striker/goal scorer? How do you learn about what the other viable positions/archetypes are?
I feel like at the younger ages, it's really only about scoring goals. Run away from a coach that pigeon holes players in the early years, even more so if it's just about winning. The more positions you play the better, even in the net. You gain critical understanding of the role of each position and how each can work together/compliment each other. A coach that doesn't fixate on wins will take more risks with lineups, trying out different players around the field, and making sure everyone gets good PT. Even in HS and college coaches value a player who can fill multiple roles depending on need. Get stuck in one spot you're not only losing development experiences but you're more likely to get replaced by someone who does it slightly better
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Do you have any thoughts/advice on positions? Is it easier to stick if you're not trying to be the primary striker/goal scorer? How do you learn about what the other viable positions/archetypes are?
I feel like at the younger ages, it's really only about scoring goals. Run away from a coach that pigeon holes players in the early years, even more so if it's just about winning. The more positions you play the better, even in the net. You gain critical understanding of the role of each position and how each can work together/compliment each other. A coach that doesn't fixate on wins will take more risks with lineups, trying out different players around the field, and making sure everyone gets good PT. Even in HS and college coaches value a player who can fill multiple roles depending on need. Get stuck in one spot you're not only losing development experiences but you're more likely to get replaced by someone who does it slightly better All good politically correct advice BUT goal scorers are valued at 2X over defenders in the pro's and same as an amateur whether club, HS or college. The higher up the field you play the higher the recognition and the rewards, not ideal but it is a truism that is hard to argue. Please don't start the "defense win's leagues" argument , my kids are defenders and we have seen this from peewee league to now college.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Do you have any thoughts/advice on positions? Is it easier to stick if you're not trying to be the primary striker/goal scorer? How do you learn about what the other viable positions/archetypes are?
I feel like at the younger ages, it's really only about scoring goals. Run away from a coach that pigeon holes players in the early years, even more so if it's just about winning. The more positions you play the better, even in the net. You gain critical understanding of the role of each position and how each can work together/compliment each other. A coach that doesn't fixate on wins will take more risks with lineups, trying out different players around the field, and making sure everyone gets good PT. Even in HS and college coaches value a player who can fill multiple roles depending on need. Get stuck in one spot you're not only losing development experiences but you're more likely to get replaced by someone who does it slightly better All good politically correct advice BUT goal scorers are valued at 2X over defenders in the pro's and same as an amateur whether club, HS or college. The higher up the field you play the higher the recognition and the rewards, not ideal but it is a truism that is hard to argue. Please don't start the "defense win's leagues" argument , my kids are defenders and we have seen this from peewee league to now college. Not everyone can play striker. That isn't how the world works.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Larry, Any idea when NEPAL U16 (2003) website will be updated to 2018-2019??
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,165 Likes: 78
Chief Rocker Back of THE NET
|
Chief Rocker Back of THE NET
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 22,165 Likes: 78 |
Larry, Any idea when NEPAL U16 (2003) website will be updated to 2018-2019?? No. I have enough to deal with keeping BOTN current.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
That is now run by EDP. Go to the EDP website and look for the U-16 age group.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
All good politically correct advice BUT goal scorers are valued at 2X over defenders in the pro's and same as an amateur whether club, HS or college. The higher up the field you play the higher the recognition and the rewards, not ideal but it is a truism that is hard to argue. Please don't start the "defense win's leagues" argument , my kids are defenders and we have seen this from peewee league to now college.
I'm curious to hear how the DA rosters are constructed. Are they just taking "best available players" or trying to build a roster around a formation/strategy? Is it "easier" to make DA if the kid is going for a non-striker position?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
All good politically correct advice BUT goal scorers are valued at 2X over defenders in the pro's and same as an amateur whether club, HS or college. The higher up the field you play the higher the recognition and the rewards, not ideal but it is a truism that is hard to argue. Please don't start the "defense win's leagues" argument , my kids are defenders and we have seen this from peewee league to now college.
I'm curious to hear how the DA rosters are constructed. Are they just taking "best available players" or trying to build a roster around a formation/strategy? Is it "easier" to make DA if the kid is going for a non-striker position? Well, first things first, all sons of coaches, board members and important club supporters and/or political favors are automatically accepted. Then we can get into best players, best fit, etc.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
All good politically correct advice BUT goal scorers are valued at 2X over defenders in the pro's and same as an amateur whether club, HS or college. The higher up the field you play the higher the recognition and the rewards, not ideal but it is a truism that is hard to argue. Please don't start the "defense win's leagues" argument , my kids are defenders and we have seen this from peewee league to now college.
I'm curious to hear how the DA rosters are constructed. Are they just taking "best available players" or trying to build a roster around a formation/strategy? Is it "easier" to make DA if the kid is going for a non-striker position? Very tough to generalize but many clubs, especially no MLS clubs, are looking to fill rosters with players who can pay. At MLS it's more about the talent and forming the optimal team. Also, if DA is supposed to be about development then in theory players should be training in multiple positions and be able to fill different roles (except GK)
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So what realistically happens to the talented kid that was just cut by a DA team? Do they get a second chance?
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So what realistically happens to the talented kid that was just cut by a DA team? Do they get a second chance? Many MLS DA players cut can just move down to one of the other non-MLS DAs. For non-MLS DA players cut - some can find another DA team, but more will not.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So what realistically happens to the talented kid that was just cut by a DA team? Do they get a second chance? Yes, they go to Met Oval of BWG.
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So what realistically happens to the talented kid that was just cut by a DA team? Do they get a second chance? Many MLS DA players cut can just move down to one of the other non-MLS DAs. For non-MLS DA players cut - some can find another DA team, but more will not. Or in the case of NYCFC they just push them down to one of their affiliates like Met Oval, NY Soccer club, or World Class where they use them as a farm system. Where it just so happens those same clubs are DA Clubs.. yup you heard that right.. you want to talk about unfair practices.. Where now, NYCFC has a roster of over 50 players between 2 clubs they can source from.. How is this even allowed to exist or how is it even fair for the other DA clubs in the area????
|
Like
Reply
Quote
|
|
More pics we like
|
|
|